Teen Sex and Pregnancy
Celebrities, Politics December 20th, 2007The “good girl” of the family, Jamie Lynn Spears has officially announced that she is 3 months pregnant. With the news of the sixteen-year-old’s pregnancy comes much controversy. Shadow and I were chatting about it on MSN and this post sort of spawned.
The post is REALLY long; you have been warned:
THE FACTS
Jamie Lynn Spears. 16 years old. Younger sister of Britney Spears. Pregnant with her 18/19 (his age is disputed) year old non-famous boyfriend, Casey Aldridge.
TEEN SEX AND THE CONSENSUAL RAPE DEBATE
When rape (one person forcing another to have sex) was defined, 18 became the age of legality. According to science people, up until that age the human brain is not fully able to make an informed decision so “consensual” (they both agreed to do it) does not make a difference. If you were 18 or older, you were an adult. If you were younger, you were a child. Thus, if an adult had sex with a child, it was rape. However, no “what-ifs” were considered. For example: what if the two in question are very close in age and where, then, is the line drawn?
This began becoming an issue more recently as teen sex began to rise and parents (and spectators) began to look to government to regulate the growing problem. I’ve heard cases where parents did not approve of boyfriends and, when the boyfriend turned eighteen, pressed charges against him even though the sexual relationship had been going since beforehand and the daughter in question was seventeen. (I’ve also heard of girlfriends claiming rape later on, knowing the law, after a fight with the boyfriend even though the sex was consensual).
In some states, laws have been passed to clarify this issue. For example, in some there is a two year rule. It is rape unless the two people are within two years of each other. For some, it is rape no matter what but the distance in age determines the severity of the crime. For example, it is a felony if the age difference is more than two years but a misdemeanor if they are within those two years. (In some places, it is considered rape even if both are under eighteen). Or, as Shadow points out, the girl could be the older and the guy the younger.
And the consequences? For having sex with your boyfriend or girlfriend while underage, you could be put in jail and have to register as a sex offender, forever stigmatizing you with that “child molester” label and all of the rules, regulations, and suspicion that come with it.
Depending on Aldridge’s age (reporters are unsure of whether he is 18 or 19), the couple could be in or out of that two year span easily. However, needless to say, charges won’t be pressed for obvious stardom reasons.
But, with this issue on the cover of tabloids and in the media, the question will be raised once more. Should kids be allowed to have sex? Are they old enough to make that decision on their own? Should it be against the law and considered rape?
TEENAGE PREGNANCY: TO KEEP OR NOT TO KEEP?
When a teen gets pregnant, after all of the OMGWTH RU CRZY/STPD! the whole issue of what to do comes in.
Abortion - After the immorality of premarital teenage sex, some people feel that the killing of the child should occur to “wipe away” the offense. Two wrongs make a right, correct? This is usually done on the basis that the mother is in no position to raise the child, that it kills her future, and it will hide the i-had-sex-and-got-pregnant statement from the world. In Jamie Lynn’s case, because of her stardom, she does have the means to raise the child. Whether it will ruin her career is being debated. As for hiding her mistake, after her two week period of keeping it to herself, she seems to be fine about getting it out in the open and taking responsibility.
Adoption - For those who don’t want the child for the above reasons but don’t want the second immorality of killing the child, adoption is Plan B. In many cases, the mother of the new mother makes the decision. Before my aunt met my uncle, she had a baby as a teenager. Her mom wanted her to have an abortion, but she refused, so they “compromised” on adoption. Every year on the child’s birthday, my aunt mourned for her daughter. To her, the child was dead.
Keep It - For those willing to sacrifice (or as my dad would say, too selfish to think of the child), Plan C is to keep the child and raise it as your own. While my dad would say this is irresponsible, I think the opposite as long as the new mother really will be dedicated to her child and willing to work and sacrifice. This seems to be where Jamie Lynn falls. She plans to raise the child in Louisiana and give it a “normal, family life.”
My best friend got pregnant around the same age as Jamie Lynn. She kept her son and has sacrificed every day since to give him the best life possible. Though she has given up so much because of it (dropped out of high school, immediately forced into role of adult, struggling to make ends meet), she doesn’t regret it at all and she is one of the best moms that I know. He is such an amazing boy that I love: talented, smart, funny. Imagine if she had aborted him or given him up for adoption. In her case she had many other issues going on as well. When she got pregnant, she resolved that everything else was gone too so that it wouldn’t harm him. In her case, the pregnancy was a blessing because she was heading towards the paths of Ms. Britney and Ms. Lindsay.
Another issue that comes up is the father. Will he stick around? If so, should the two get married. In my friend’s case, the dad denied being the father and left her. In a coworkers case, both sets of parents forced the two to marry for the child but they aren’t happy. Aldridge has been reported to be an “upstanding” guy who will stick around but there is no word of any planned marraige. We’ll see how that goes.
WHAT NOW?
Jamie Lynn moves back to Louisiana. Her show, Zoey 101, *should* air its fourth season as it is already filmed (though there are suggestions that Nickelodeon should not air it as a result, though they have shown support for her decision to take responsibility and care for her well-being). Aldridge will have to decide what role to play: father, husband, both, or neither? Will Jamie Lynn take after her big sister’s parenting skills (or lack thereof) or be a good mother? Will she stay in showbiz? I guess we’ll all find out.
ENDING OPINIONS
Personally I don’t agree with kids having sex randomly. I do feel that if two are in a consensual relationship and understand possible consequences (and, hopefully take precautions), then that is their decision.
I don’t feel that the rape laws relating to the small age differences are fair for many reasons and don’t feel that it should clog/back-up our justice system. If it was consensual, it was consensual. (If the ages were much younger, something should be done — but not rape). It’s a very sticky issue with many crevices of possibilities and the justice system can’t provide for each of those.
I don’t feel that he should be charged with rape–the other consensual cases shouldn’t either–but it would be hard to legally show differentiation between rape and non-rape without the blanket all-is-rape standards. What if she claims it was rape because they had a fight? What if the jury assumes the former is true because she doesn’t seem sincere or “hurt” enough but she really WAS raped and the guy gets away? And providing for everything would both a) back up the lawmaking system for this when there are bigger issues to work on and b) allow for many loopholes to let real rapists and child molesters to get away.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? COMMENT!
I typed for over an hour on this baby (no pun intended); type for a minute and give your feedback?
FURTHER READING
December 20th, 2007 at 5:03 am
I agree with you. Pregnancy…. *sign* i don’t even dare to think about it.
December 20th, 2007 at 11:46 pm
He’s 18. I’d post the link to the article that said it but I lost it -_-
Being brought up as a Catholic, I’ve been taught to save it for marriage…and while I agree to it (also because it’ll save me a lot of trouble - I’m selfish!), I’m all for the fact that this “maturity” is relative; it doesn’t just suddenly come when you hit 16/17/18 (whatever the age of consent is.)
IMO, teens view sex in many ways and this leads to a whole lot of consequences. Some view it as one way because of their faith (read: “a sacred union between husband and wife, etc etc.”) Some see it as fun. Ultimately, their views will play a part in whether they end up in situations like Jamie’s - or not.
And let’s not get started on how teens get their “knowledge”/views on the issue (parents, movies etc); we’ve heard it all before.
December 21st, 2007 at 12:42 am
I think there should still be a law against rape but the details need some adjusting.
If it was consensual between both persons, then I don’t see the reason for stopping them. If they choose to have sex at a young age then they should be aware of the consequences, if not, well they have to deal with making that decision.
December 22nd, 2007 at 11:41 pm
Heh… I’m 18, my boyfriend’s not, and we joke a lot about how I’m into ‘little children’.
In North Carolina, the law states that there should be I think a 4 year difference between a minor and an adult, I think. But personally, having turned 18 years old a few months ago, I really don’t feel at all like an ‘adult’ and I still consider myself as a child.
Personally, I think that many teenagers don’t really think rationally about sex and are driven by their drives and not by the consequences that comes with those drives. However, setting up a law that’s rigidly based on age is stupid. Because consensual sex is a two-people decision. And it is in my opinion that both people are responsible when they commit such acts. I’m assuming that’s why we go through sex-ed and all those really boring videos about pregnancy in middle and high school: to be informed so we don’t make those stupid mistakes.
December 24th, 2007 at 9:12 pm
ugh, Mei Zhu just took the words right out of my mouth!
I recently heard on E! channel that he’s 18.
December 26th, 2007 at 2:17 am
Happy Holidays Skye! *hugs*
December 26th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
i just read all this on the news myself. i was quite shocked to hear that JL was pregnant, thinking that she could maybe clean up the spears line. i looked everything up. the news i read said Casey is 18 going on 19, however on his own myspace profile, he says he is 17.
his headline on his mypsace page says that the relationship is over, which leaves Jamie Lynn to be a single parent.
http://thesuperficial.com/2007/12/jamie_lynn_spears_will_probabl_1.php
this subject has always tickled me the wrong way. i hate teenage sex. kids shouldn’t have kids.
jamie’s parents think casey is a wonderful guy, however. but that still does not equal legal/consentual.
and there’s a LOT of flaws with the law. there’s a lot of flaws with everything, but then again, you have to have a flaw to break the law.
haha how clever.
i live in kansas, dude, and it’s BAD here. there’s people that aren’t even my age with TWO kids let alone one or one on the way. it’s absolutely ludicrous and something needs to be done.
my least favorite part of it is the whole girl thing. when a couple gets into a fight and the girl says he raped her. girls say it ALL the time, even if there is no age gap, you know? girls can say “he raped me” any time they want and it puts men in a horrible place. i mean, if she was under age, like it or not, it’s rape. a guy can at LEAST ask how old the girl is.
and you know what, if he has to ask…
don’t. do. it.
plain and simple.
leave the snake in the cage and the cats in their traps.
scuse my language but i’m really really opinionated about such things.
December 27th, 2007 at 11:50 am
Here in Belgium, the law is a little different. I am not a 100 percent certain, but I believe that the minimum age for having sex between two people and not calling it rape is 16. Personally, I think that age is much fairer than 18: when we take in consideration the number of teens that had sex before turning 16 and the same for turning 18 years old, the number will probably drop heavily. In my opinion, it is normal for teenagers to have sex between age 16 and 18. By then, they should have at least enough brains to think about possible consequences too. There should rather be a law saying it’s forbidden to have sex until one can clearly think and talk about possible consequences. Apart from the fact it is impossible to check, this would probably be the only fair law regarding teenage sex ever.
I don’t believe in waiting till marriage. For one simple reason: what if he/she sucks? What if they really cannot have sex properly? Sure, people can say sex does not matter as long as there is love, but I can ensure you that feeling will go away quite soon. Sex is a natural part of a love life…I do believe people should think really hard before going to bed with someone and talk about it and possible consequences.
I’m not really too interested in Jamie Lynn Spears and her lovelife: I do hope she does a better job raising children than her big sister did. I cannot really be bothered to read her boyfriend’s MySpace too or anything like that, but I do hope they both have a happy life sort of, especially for their unborn child. Boys should take their responsibility though: in my opinion, if they can make a child, they can take care of it too.
Just my humble share on the matter.
December 27th, 2007 at 11:58 pm
now as much as I really wanna read this because I’ve had similar debates myself, I’m on a quick time limit. so I’ll get back to you on that.
but I wanted to thank you for your support with me and cade. we talked about it further today for the first time and I made it clear I won’t forget but I can forgive and it’ll be a long while till I trust again. he swears he’s willing to do whatever it takes so I think we’ll be fine. =].